Regie:
Luc BessonScenario:
Luc BessonCamera:
Thierry ArbogastMuziek:
Eric SerraActeurs:
Freddie Highmore, Selena Gomez, Mia Farrow, Jimmy Fallon, Snoop Dogg, Asa Butterfield, Lou Reed, Ron Crawford, Robert Stanton, Penny Balfour, Will.i.am (meer)Streaming (1)
Samenvattingen(1)
Arthur (Freddie Highmore) heeft lang gewacht op het moment dat hij weer terug kan keren naar de wereld van de Minimoys en zijn geliefde Selenia. In het dorp hebben de Minimoys een feestmaal voor Arthur klaargemaakt en Selenia heeft haar mooiste jurk uit de kast gehaald. Maar als het eindelijk zo ver is, besluit Arthur’s vader de vakantie bij oma op te schorten. Het lijkt erop dat de enige kans voor Arthur om terug te keren naar de wereld van de kleine wezentjes die zijn opa ooit tekende, verloren gaat. Totdat een spin een kleine rijstkorrel in Arthur’s hand achterlaat, met een noodbericht van een onbekende afzender. Het moet wel Selenia zijn die in gevaar is! Arthur twijfelt niet en begint meteen aan een gevaarlijke reis naar de wereld van de Minimoys. Daarbij stuit hij op de soldaten van Kröb, de nieuwe tiran van de Zeven Koninkrijken, en moet hij vechten tegen ratten, kikkers en enge spinnen. Als Arthur eindelijk aankomt in het dorp van de Minimoys, blijkt dat zij hem nooit een noodbericht hebben gestuurd. Maar wie heeft Arthur dan in de val gelokt? (Independent Films)
(meer)Video's (2)
Recensie (3)
For the second part, at least the main actors were able to be cast, without whom it would not be possible. Freddie Highmore returned, his grandmother Mia Farrow, and as for the animated ones, they all returned, only with different voices. Selena Gomez got the voice of Selenia, which is closer to her character and name, plus she is the same age as Freddie Highmore. Maltazard got the voice of Lou Reed, which is also not bad, and vocally, half of Black Eyed Peas - Will.i.am and Fergie - are also featured in the film. Why am I talking so much about interesting voices? Because I literally can't stand this film. I was expecting how the quite interesting story would continue, but instead of any continuation, I got a stretched mess where nothing happens at all. The whole thing is based on the fact that Maltazard wants to get into the human world, which he eventually succeeds in, and that's where it ends, and the viewer has to wait for the last part. It's a shame, if it had been made only as a duology, maybe it would have turned out better and it wouldn't have been such an empty mishmash. I'm really sorry because of these actors, and also because of the world that looked really cool, but "Arthur and the Revenge of Maltazard" is absolutely about nothing. And what is supposed to be that revenge anyway? More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/06/past-na-zraloka-21-jump-street.html
()
This is definitely the weakest part of the Invisibles trilogy, it works more as a bridge between the first and the third part than as a standalone film, and it is especially a fertile ground for the conclusion of the trilogy, so it is important to watch the third part right away to achieve some effect. Some of the ideas were nice, but it often slipped into the dull and sometimes slightly embarrassing. In short, a film that was made solely to set the mood for the final part.
()
It's utterly terrible in that Hallmark kind of way, but I somehow take it as a cheap alternative to those giant Pixar/DreamWorks productions, compared to which it's not as capable of masking what a terrible load of tripe it is. If David Bowie did the voice of Maltazard in the first one and Lou Reed in the second, I expect he could be dubbed in the third one by, say, Lešek Semelka.
()
Reclame